Translate

Friday, 26 October 2012

Our local MP is looking for answers!

Hello reader,

I contacted my MP's Senior Caseworker with the email below.

--
Joanna,

Nicole called the UKBA on Tuesday late afternoon and a different person told her that we fall under the old rules as Nicole entered the UK on a visa issued before 9 July 2012.

This comes as a huge relief as you can imagine but I have to say we are very disappointed with the UKBA and the Home Office itself who also told us we would be subject to the new rules. The UKBA gave bad information out to Nicole, the East Lothian Courier, the Daily Express and to your office. So on four out of five occasions they were wrong when advising on the rules they are meant to know and understand. You have to wonder how many others have been and will continue to be put through unnecessary worry and distress?

I would like to thank you for your help and advice during both the fiance visa process and with this, it is very much appreciated.


Kind regards,

John

--

I was hoping that her office would not just let this go and follow up to find out how we were misinformed on so many occasions. Her response is below.

--
Dear John,

Many thanks for keeping me up-to-date.  I will make sure that Fiona is informed – she will be delighted by this news.  Fiona will also take this matter up with the Minister with regards to the process/confusion and as soon as she has received a response she will be in touch with you.

Wishing you and your wife a very happy future together.

Please do not hesitate to get back in touch should you have any other difficulties in the future or if you have any other issues which you wish to raise with Fiona.

Kind regards

Joanna
--

Good news as far as we are concerned. Hopefully the UKBA will realise they need to take action with regards to how their staff are handling such enquiries. What is really worrying is that some people may have just accepted this bad information and already left the UK because of it.

Thank you for reading.

John

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

Finally!

Hello reader,

So we finally have the answer we wanted to hear. Nicole spent a good half hour on the phone with Jessica from the UK Border Agency and she was able to confirm that we will be considered under the old rules.


This comes as a huge relief as you can imagine and Nicole and I can finally focus on the next stage of our journey. What's next for us? Well now we must fill out the FLR(M) form, gather all of our information together and get the Spouse visa application sent off.

What I find difficult to understand is how someone at the UKBA managed to misinform first Nicole and then after that a local newspaper the East Lothian Courier, a national newspaper the Daily Express and an MP's office. We were also misinformed by the Citizen's Advice Bureau and worst of all the Home Office!!!

The kind of distress this has caused Nicole and I was absolutely the last thing we needed right after our wedding. Hopefully our story can help others avoid such a situation.

I'll continue to update regarding our application and hopefully in the near future I will be able to report that we were successful.

Thank you to everyone who has helped us so far and thank you for reading.

John

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

A response from the Home Office...of sorts

Hello reader,

Is it just me or is everyone I ask incapable of giving me a straight answer?
  
Dear John C Tait

Thank you for your email of 15/10/12 about the introduction of a minimum income requirement for sponsoring a spouse or partner under the Immigration Rules.
 
From 9 July 2012, British citizens or those settled in the UK who wish to sponsor a non-European Economic Area (EEA) spouse or partner on the family migration route need to meet a minimum income requirement of £18,600, with additional financial requirements to sponsor a child under the age of 18 before the partner reaches settlement: £22,400 for one child in addition to the partner and an additional £2,400 for each further child.  The additional financial requirement for children applies to non-British or non-EEA children who are being sponsored under the Immigration Rules. 

The purpose of the minimum income requirement for sponsorship is to ensure that family migrants are supported at a reasonable level so that they do not become a burden on the taxpayer and they can participate sufficiently in everyday life to facilitate their integration in British society.  British citizens and those settled in the UK are free to enter into a genuine relationship with whomever they choose, but if they wish to establish their family life in the UK, it is appropriate that they should do so on a basis that does not increase burdens on the taxpayer and promotes integration.

Everyone has a right under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to respect for their private and family life, however it is not an absolute right.  It is legitimate to interfere with the exercise of that right where it is in the public interest to do so, and in particular where it is necessary for public protection or for the economic well-being of the UK, which includes maintaining our immigration controls.

The maintenance requirement before 9 July in practice meant that any sponsor earning, after tax and housing costs have been deducted, more than the equivalent of income support for a couple (around £5,795 a year) was deemed to have sufficient funds to sponsor a spouse or partner.  This is inadequate to prevent burdens on the taxpayer; whilst the migrant spouse or partner cannot access most welfare benefits before settlement, their presence in the UK may increase the sponsor’s entitlement to certain benefits, e.g. Housing Benefit. 
The minimum income requirement was set at £18,600 after considering advice from the independent Migration Advisory Committee (MAC), who had been asked to advise on what the threshold should be to ensure that the sponsor can support the spouse or partner and any dependants independently without them becoming a burden on the taxpayer.  Their report, which was published on 16 November 2011, recommended that the threshold should be set in a range between £18,600 (the level at which a couple generally ceases to be able to access income-related benefits) and £25,700 (the level at which the sponsor becomes a net contributor to the public finances). 

The present or prospective earnings, or any job offer, of the migrant spouse or partner will not be taken into account when they apply for entry clearance to come to the UK.  This is because employment overseas is no guarantee of finding work in the UK and job offers can be hard to validate.  Once the migrant is in the UK and has obtained employment, the income from this may be counted towards meeting the financial requirement at the subsequent application stages for leave to remain.  At that point the UK Border Agency will be able to check that employment has been obtained and is a reliable source of income. 

The rules make provision for cash savings above £16,000 (the level of savings at
which a person would generally not qualify for income related benefits) held by the
sponsor, the applicant or jointly for at least six months at the time of application, to
be used towards meeting the requirement.  Other income, for example from
investments or property rental, may also be taken into account. 

Full details of the changes to the family Immigration Rules, including the ways in which the financial requirement can be met, can be found on the UK Border Agency’s website at:


Yours sincerely

Public Correspondence Team

--

I feel like my question is being intentionally ignored at this point and I am becoming increasingly frustrated with the 'copy and paste' responses I am receiving.

Thank you for reading,

John